Natural Law Equality.

Peter was disoriented as he walked along the steep embankment. This was not the right time and place to be confused but he did not dare turn back. Behind him was much to flee from whereas going forward was filled with uncertainty, which is one reason he was feeling so dizzy. He stopped for a moment to catch his breath, gather himself, and to ponder what was at stake. He then pressed onward.

The ancient wisdom of Aristotelian natural law has been the foundation of moral philosophy for millennia. But like with all science and with all religion, interpretations have caused many variations to appear.

Unlike religion, science progresses by the means of methodologically sound investigations which uncover discoveries that appeal to and satisfy human logic.

The basic premise of natural law is that each (created) thing has unique characteristics which make it possible for humans to distinguish and categorize them. And so we can say a rock is a rock, a plant is a plant, an animal is an animal, and a human is a human.

Then the details of what those characteristics are comes into play. This is where ontology clarifies the distinctions between each broad category and identifies the powers and potentials of those (created) things in each category.

Like all models the ontological model is a simplification of reality and its purpose is to make understanding the world around us easier. Not surprisingly sometimes the models used in the past are insufficient for modern discernment. Adhering to old models rather than appreciating a new model will cause problems.

So let’s look at the ‘old’ ontological model. Humans are unique physically from other animals and humans are uniquely endowed with intelligence far superior to any intelligence exhibited by animals. By this definition humans are distinct as set forth by natural law.

But when science is not balanced, if it is not in harmony with the other powerful tool of discovery, then the ideal of advancement suffers. One evidence of this disorder is the almost universal rejection of the possibility of the harmony of science and religion or its corollary, the recognition of why this harmony of science and religion is so valuable.

The new ontological model is more accurate. It simply and profoundly recognizes that another marvelous distinction of humans is their spirituality. Human spirituality does not exist in the other categories of things, it is unique to humans according to natural law.

The repercussions of this new model are very, very great. I will only touch on one important theme: equality. There are so many egalitarian schemes within a plethora of social doctrines and many of those doctrines are even atheistic. The simple truth is that all humans are equal in the eyes of God. Humans are not equal in any other way.

To design schemes to make people physically the same or intellectually the same or the same in their degree of joy or pain are all vain – and now it is understood – contrary to natural law.

Equality is guaranteed! So why all of the interventionism? Answer: Ignorance of natural law and ignorance of the more advanced and more accurate ontological model.

The great suffering experienced by humanity, ironically, is the consequence of this ignorance of natural law that is practiced in the name of equality! This is just one of many greatly important reasons why interventionism is destructive to an ever-advancing civilization. To learn even more about the harmfulness of interventionism I suggest that you learn more about the divine economy theory.


Divine Economy Theory Heals The Addiction To Interventionism.

The following analogy sheds some light on this relevant subject of the contemporary economy.

One of the greatest objections to stopping intervention is the fear of the consequences. But consider the life of an addict. It is the pain and suffering and the fear of separation that makes the addict lose the self-discipline needed to begin the healing process. If pursued though, not only does the healing process take place within the individual, but also across all of the social interactions.

This is the same with the economy. In its sick and addicted state the immediate horizon of abstention looks painful, with suffering and plenty of negative consequences. Just like it is for the addict the current level of intervention is no longer sufficient and so with each increased dose there is more and more separating and corrupting of the economy further from its natural state. The economy is corrupted and distorted and so are all of the social interactions.

Look around and it is easy to see corrupted, distorted social interactions!

Until the addict decides that the loss of one’s true self is no longer acceptable the addiction continues. The strength to recover comes from the desire to honor and cherish one’s own reality. This monumental realization and discovery is often connected to a spiritual awakening.

At this time in history when the divine economy theory is just emerging there is a general ignorance of it. My task is to raise awareness about the divine economy theory so that it can become a source of strength to counteract all of the concerns about the negative consequences of withdrawal from interventionism. The healing process is very exhilarating. And freedom from addiction is natural and optimal.

There are plenty of free resources to begin the healing process and the more detailed information costs less than most prescriptions for a simple antibiotic!

the State – What Is It?

Mary Lou did not look well. She always had a good appetite but she noticed her lack of energy and so she decided to exercise more regularly and to make sure that she ate healthy food and she even began a vitamin supplement. Every attempt merely slowed her progressive weakening. It turned out she had a parasite!

To adequately talk about the State we have to go back to the early history of humanity. Although there are differences between people these are a source of wealth and joy in an environment of social cooperation. Those with excellent qualities are well regarded and chosen, oftentimes, as guides and mentors and leaders.

But there are also those who desire to control others. These individuals have been present from the beginning of human history and when they are unchecked the consequent results run contrary to the fruits of social cooperation.

Continuing to describe the historical journey of humanity, it is known that the functional progression was from family to clan and tribe to city-state to nation and now tothe entire globe. At each and every one of these epochs the possibilities of goodness from social cooperation can be contemplated in juxtaposition to the horrors resulting from the control of the ego-driven.

Since the question is “What is the State?” I will jump directly to the epoch of nation-building even though the State did appear before then, but in a less obvious form.

Some may not like this narrative. The epoch of nation-building was inaugurated by the appearance of Muhammad. But the ego-driven violated His Covenant and the perverse consequence that we are still feeling is nationalism instead of nation-building.

Nationalism is control by the ego-driven at the level of the nation-state. All statism is lustful of control and so the goal is to eliminate other states. This is done by controlling the people and their resources for the purpose of eliminating rival states.

How can the State get away with confiscating the wealth of the people, and all of its belligerence? There are many essential steps. Controlling ‘education’ is one of the critical steps. Using its ‘education’ system it paints a picture of glory and honor for the State and does all it can to eliminate critical thinking which would expose the statist myth that humans could not coexist peacefully and cooperate prosperously without the State.

The State – what is it? It is a parasitic and predatory tool of the ego-driven. Those who lust for control aspire to gain control of the State.

As long as we allow the ideology of statism to temper our regard for this monster the pattern will continue: the ego-driven will do whatever they can to try to gain control and the State will perpetually war with other states.

Are we that stupid? Surely we do not want those kind of people in control. Surely we would rather live prosperously and in peace with all the people on this precious and blessed planet.

I hope this blog shatters the myth of the State for you. Here is an economic theory that shows the magnificence of  human cooperation and it also proves that the State is not necessary (in fact, that it is harmful).

“What If” Humans Are Spiritual Beings Primarily?

What if now we are living in a time when we are ready for this understanding and a time that needs this kind of understanding for us to be able to solve the problems that we face?

How would that affect how we perceive the physical world?

In brief, our quest to understand the infinite complexity of the world around us will probably gain intensity and certainly it will gain focus.

How will that affect how we perceive our intellectual powers?

In brief, this gift of intellect will be honored more and shared for the benefit of each other since our gift is what, in turn, we can give to others.

How will that affect our purpose, knowing that we are spiritual beings primarily?

That is a good question. The answer seems to be just out of reach, sort of like the embryo in the womb – feeling more and more cramped – but not really knowing all the wonders ahead or how all of the senses developed in the womb will come in handy.

It is not really a “what if” question, it is a “roll up your sleeves and get to it” call to action.

Start by checking out this homepage.

All The Wiser, You Say?

When the seed lands on fertile soil its intended purpose begins to unfold. Weeds will need to be removed and care will need to be sustained though.

At every instant we take in information that comes from observation or deliberate research and this influx of information is knowledge. Even if it is misunderstood it still becomes part of our knowledge base for the time being until we learn otherwise. I like the use of the word “otherwise” because it includes the word ‘wise.’ Wisdom is knowledge that has gone through this process and is aligned with reality.

For all individuals knowledge is ever-present and readily accessible. The nature of knowledge is that it is ever-present and readily accessible. The role of knowledge is to satisfy the need to know. This loop of the nature and role of knowledge is self-sustaining if unimpeded.

When the nature and role of knowledge is unimpeded the economy functions at its highest potential.

In the divine economy model it is the axis of the “Nature and Role of Knowledge” that all things revolve around.

Whatever allows the free flow of knowledge serves the economy best. All interventionism constrains the free flow of knowledge hence it is harmful to the economy and to the people of the world.

Now is the time to learn about macroeconomics without the State.

Savings, Time Preference, and Future Civilization

Randy notices things and he takes the time to think about what he sees. He is like you and me because he gains understanding by examining and pondering cause and effect.

Good economics is the opposite of the nonsense of debt and spending. The very best school of economic thought is Austrian economics which is built upon the foundation laid by Menger and Bohm-Bawerk, Mises, and Rothbard, and which recognizes the subjective nature of human decisions. One aspect of the subjective decision-making that humans make has to do with the future.

Time preference and savings are part of economics and economics is, broadly speaking, the study of human action. One of the laws of human action that is understood apriori is that humans prefer to have now what is desired rather than at some time in the future. This is what the economic term of time preference represents.

Of course time preference is subjective so the degree of preferring now to the future changes for an individual and across individuals for many reasons and over time. In societies where humans are no longer just barely subsistent it manifests itself in the economy as savings which in turn becomes capital and becomes a part of the capital structure. The capital and the capital structure transform the level of productivity in the economy in a manner that meets the hopes for the future that is inherent in the time preference of that society.

As examples, if one society fears war and inflation in the future the time preferences would be very high and under those conditions saving makes little sense. If another society is at peace with other neighboring societies and the value of its money is appreciating because of the effects of increasing productivity then the time preference is relatively low and the tendency to save would be greater.

Not only is time preference an indicator of the anxiety or tranquility of a society but it also directly affects the amount of savings which then affects directly the potential for transformation since it affects the capital and the capital structure.

In other words, the peaceful society will be more prosperous and the people in that society will not only have more goods and service available but will also have put aside money as savings which will enable them to be able to purchase and enjoy these new and wondrous things.

Now suppose the peaceful and prosperous society has a significant number of people who become less attached to earthly pleasures because of a changed spiritual orientation. In the present they will not need as much as before and this means that their time preference decreases. This translates into more savings and more capital to enter the capital structure. The capital and the capital structure is what transforms the economy and that transformation always is in the direction of serving the consumer.

What goods and services will best serve the increasing number of these spiritually motivated members of society? None of this can be known ahead of time. What is known is that societies in the future will look different from the one we know and at some point in time those societies will be significantly different from anything we imagined.

A new economic technology shows the promise of the future.

Socialism = Declination. It is the destroyer of civilization.

Lurking in the dark is the phantom, but being unsuspecting Richard and Elaham just go about their business as usual. They are in danger and do not know it. There are serious consequences ahead for them, perpetuated by the silent phantom. Richard and Elaham would have been wise to have been watchful.

Watchful and wise. When the incentive to save wanes the immediate consequences are not seen unless socialism is full-blown and chronic.

If a society has in the past had incentives to save, then when it transitions to socialism the full effect of this destructive ideology will be masked by capital consumption. There will still be resources carried over from the earlier times when capital was used to generate products for the future.

Examine the incentives to save in socialism. You do not own anything because it is collectivized. Some may reply ‘that is only in an extreme system of socialism but other lesser degrees of socialism allow ownership.’ But at some point the table tips because the disincentives to be the productive members of society become too great. Why work hard and save when others who do not work hard and save receive the benefits? This progressively whittles away at the numbers who are willing to work hard and save.

For example, when you do not own the place where you live and it needs repair do you (or will most people) take on the costs of the repairs?

The declination and deterioration begins to set in. Look at Venezuela.

Getting out of the blight of socialism is far more difficult than being lulled into it. Without ownership there is very little incentive to save (“Save for what?” is the pressing question.) which means that over time there are less and less available goods and services, eventually leading to the extreme system where the political class has all the wealth and the rest are impoverished.

Why would politicians strive for this? First, they are the ones in the political class. Then there are those who are actually militant Marxists who think that helping to destroy capitalism leads to the glorious age of communism!

How can politicians get away with portraying socialism as a noble ends?

  • First, there is enough remnant capital that hides – in the short run – the destructiveness of socialism.
  • Second, the politician demonizes wealth which enables the State:
  1.  to distract attention away from the corruption of the State
  2. to extract even more from those who have wealth, sustaining the State
  3. and this also satisfies the envy of the masses.
  • Third, the politician actually unabashedly promises to give people some of the wealth that it confiscates from the wealthy.
  • Fourth, the politician allows the State to counterfeit the currency and amass great debt to give the illusion of viability.

Socialism = Declination. It is the destroyer of civilization.

Now is the time to learn about macroeconomics without the State.